Industry, Environmental Leaders Respond to EPA Rollback of 2009 Climate Finding

February 13, 2026

Listen to this article:

Key Takeaways

  • Volvo Group North America said it remains committed to improving fuel efficiency and reducing greenhouse gas emissions in its highway vehicles, regardless of federal regulatory changes.
  • Environmental Defense Fund President Fred Krupp called the repeal unlawful and said EDF will challenge the decision in court, citing health, economic, and climate concerns.
  • California Attorney General Rob Bonta and Gov. Gavin Newsom criticized the repeal and said the state will pursue legal action to defend environmental protections.
  • With the 2009 Endangerment Finding rescinded, the legal foundation for federal greenhouse gas standards on cars and heavy-duty trucks has been removed, setting the stage for court battles that could determine the future emissions framework.

Reactions are mounting following President Donald Trump and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin’s decision to rescind the 2009 Greenhouse Gas Endangerment Finding and eliminate federal vehicle greenhouse gas (GHG) standards.

Industry representatives, environmental groups, and state officials are offering sharply different views on the implications of the move, particularly for vehicle manufacturers and the broader transportation sector.

Volvo Group North America emphasized that its commitment to efficiency remains unchanged regardless of federal regulation.

“Regardless of regulation, improving fuel efficiency is a powerful way to deliver both customer value and reduced greenhouse gas emissions,” said Janie Coley, director of public relations, Volvo Group North America. “Our new highway vehicles are the most efficient we’ve ever produced, and we’re committed to continuing our leadership in this area to benefit our customers’ bottom lines and the environment.”

Environmental organizations, like the Environmental Defense Fund, strongly criticized the EPA’s action.

“Administrator Lee Zeldin has directed EPA to stop protecting the American people from the pollution that’s causing worse storms, floods, and skyrocketing insurance costs,” said Fred Krupp, president of EDF, calling the repeal “an unlawful, year-long effort” that “rejects the overwhelming evidence that climate pollution threatens everyone’s health and safety.”

Krupp said the decision would lead to “more pollution” and “higher costs and real harms for American families,” citing threats to property values, insurance availability, crop yields, and water supplies. He also pointed to climate-related disasters that have cost the U.S. more than $3 trillion since 1980, adding that EDF will challenge the decision in court.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta similarly announced legal action.

“Under President Trump, the EPA has been consistent in its disregard for the high cost its decisions have on human health,” Bonta said. He called the repeal “a reckless rejection of decades of scientific evidence supporting the Endangerment Finding and a violation of well-settled law.” Bonta said California will challenge what he described as an illegal action and continue defending public health and environmental protections.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom also criticized the administration’s move during remarks at the Munich Security Conference on Feb. 13.

“Pollution is an act of theft in the health of a nation,” Newsom said. He called Trump “a wholly owned subsidiary of big oil, gas, and coal,” and said the administration is attempting to reverse decades of environmental policy.

The repeal of the Endangerment Finding removes the legal foundation for federal GHG emissions standards for motor vehicles, including heavy-duty commercial trucks. Legal challenges from environmental groups and states are expected to shape how, and whether, the regulatory framework governing vehicle emissions evolves in the months ahead.